SEC Filing | Pilgrim's Pride Corporation

View:

Download DOC

Download PDF

Download XLS

Pilgrim's Pride Corporation Form 10K FY2004

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

____________________

FORM 10-K

____________________

(Mark One)

x	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended October 2, 2004

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from			to

Commission File number 1-9273

PILGRIM’S PRIDE CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	75-1285071
(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)

110 South Texas
Pittsburg, Texas	75686-0093
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (903) 855-1000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, Par Value $0.01	New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes x No ¨

The aggregate market value of the Registrant’s Common Stock, $0.01 par value, held by non-affiliates of the Registrant as of April 2, 2004, was $344,530,286. For purposes of the foregoing calculation only, all directors, executive officers and 5% beneficial owners have been deemed affiliates.

Number of shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock outstanding as of November 19, 2004, was 66,555,733.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the Registrant’s proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders to be held January 26, 2005 are incorporated by reference into Part III.

PILGRIM’S PRIDE CORPORATION

FORM 10-K

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I
		Page
Item 1.	Business	4
Item 2.	Properties	24
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	25
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	26

PART II
Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters	27
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	29
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
	of Operations	32
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
	Forward Looking Statements and Risk Factors	48
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (see Index to Financial Statements and
	Schedules below).	56
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial
	Disclosure.	56
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	56
Item 9B.	Other Information	57

PART III
Item 10.	Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant	57
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	57
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
	Stockholder Matters	57
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions	57
Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	58

PART IV
Item 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	58
Signatures		65

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES
Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		67
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of October 2, 2004 and September 27, 2003		68
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended October 2, 2004, September 27, 2003 and September 28, 2002		69

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended October 2, 2004, September 27, 2003 and September 28, 2002		70
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended October 2, 2004, September 27, 2003 and September 28, 2002		71

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		72
Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for the years ended		94
October 2, 2004, September 27, 2003 and September 28, 2002

PART I

Item 1. Business

General

Overview and Recent Developments

The Company, which was incorporated in Texas in 1968 and reincorporated in Delaware in 1986, is the successor to a partnership founded in 1946 as a retail feed store. Over the years, the Company grew through both internal growth and various acquisitions of farming operations and poultry processors including the significant acquisition discussed below. We are the second largest producer of poultry in both the United States ("U.S.") and Mexico, the largest in Puerto Rico, and have one of the best known brand names in the poultry industry. In the U.S., we produce both prepared and fresh chicken and turkey; while in Mexico and Puerto Rico, we exclusively produce fresh chicken. Through vertical integration, we control the breeding, hatching and growing of chickens. We also control the processing, preparation, packag ing and sale of our product lines, which we believe has made us one of the highest quality, lowest-cost producers of poultry in North America. We have consistently applied a long-term business strategy of focusing our growth efforts on the higher-value, higher-margin prepared foods products and have become a recognized industry leader in this market segment. Accordingly, our sales efforts have traditionally been targeted to the foodservice industry, principally chain restaurants and food processors. We have continually made investments to ensure our prepared foods capabilities remain state-of-the-art and have complemented these investments with a substantial and successful research and development effort. In fiscal 2004, we sold 5.3 billion pounds of dressed chicken and 310.2 million pounds of dressed turkey and generated net sales of $5.4 billion. In fiscal 2004, our U.S. operations including Puerto Rico accounted for 92.8% of our net sales, with the remaining 7.2% arising from our Mexico operations.

Business Acquisition

On November 23, 2003, we completed the purchase of all the outstanding stock of the corporations represented as the ConAgra Foods, Inc. chicken division ("ConAgra chicken division"). We sometimes refer to this acquisition as the "fiscal 2004 acquisition." The acquired business has been included in our results of operations since the date of the acquisition. The acquisition provided us with additional lines of specialty prepared chicken products, well-known brands, well-established distributor relationships and Southeastern U.S. processing facilities. The acquisition also included the largest distributor of chicken products in Puerto Rico. This allows us to provide customers at every point in the distribution chain with the broadest range of quality value-added chicken products and services available in the mark et today. See Note B-Business Acquisition of the notes to consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein.

We have substantially completed integrating the operations of the ConAgra chicken division into the Company. We believe we have realized significant synergies at this time from the acquisition and believe there will be further synergies identified in the future as part of our on-going business strategy implementation, including the implementation of a "best practices" approach across all of our operations.

Restructuring of Turkey Operations

On April 26, 2004, we announced a plan to restructure our turkey business to significantly reduce our production of commodity turkey meat and strengthen our focus on value-added turkey products. As part of our restructuring effort, we sold our Hinton, Virginia turkey commodity meat operations. As a result, we now purchase turkey meat for processing into turkey prepared foods products, but continue to grow turkeys for our premium line of fresh and frozen whole turkeys. We estimate that the restructuring will have a positive impact on our fiscal 2005 pre-tax earnings of approximately $25-$30 million and decrease our fiscal 2005 commodity sales in our turkey division by approximately $70 million. In fiscal 2004 we recorded, as cost of sales-restructuring, approximately $64.2 million and, as other restructuring cha rges, $7.9 million related to exit and severance costs. The restructuring will significantly reduce our production of commodity turkey meat and strengthen our focus on value-added turkey products, such as cooked deli breast, turkey sausages, turkey burgers, ground turkey, salads and ready to cook roasts.

Recall Related Issues

In October 2002, one product sample produced in our Franconia, Pennsylvania facility that had not been shipped to customers tested positive for Listeria. We later received information from the USDA suggesting environmental samples taken at the facility had tested positive for both the strain of Listeria identified in the product and a strain having characteristics similar to those of the strain identified in a Northeastern Listeria outbreak. As a result, we voluntarily recalled all cooked deli products produced at the plant from May 1, 2002 through October 11, 2002. We carry insurance designed to cover the direct recall related expenses and certain aspects of the related business interruption caused by a recall. As a result of this recall, the Company’s insurance claim for business interruption and certain product re-establishment costs amounted to approximately $74 million for the period from the date of the recall through October 11, 2003, the one-year anniversary of the recall and the insurance policy time limitation period for business interruption loss recovery. Aggregating the direct recall expense claim with the anticipated business interruption and product re-establishment costs, our total loss was approximately $100 million, although our policy limit was $50 million. We received $4 million of this amount in fiscal 2003 and the remaining $46 million in fiscal 2004 from our insurer. In connection with the receipt of the insurance proceeds discussed above, we recognized $23.8 million recorded as a component of non-recurring recoveries in our consolidated statement of income for fiscal 2004.

Our Website

Our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are available free of charge on our website at www.pilgrimspride.com, under the "Investors - Financials - SEC Filings" caption as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Strategy

Our objectives are (1) to increase sales, profit margins and earnings and (2) to outpace the growth of, and maintain our leadership position in, the poultry industry. To achieve these goals, we plan to continue pursuing the following strategies:

- Capitalize on significant scale with leading industry position and brand recognition. We are the second largest producer of chicken products in the U.S. We estimate that our U.S. market share, based on the total annual chicken production in the U.S., is approximately 15.5%, which is approximately 68% higher than the third largest competitor in the chicken industry. The complementary fit of markets, distributor relationships and geographic locations are a few of the many benefits we realized from o ur fiscal 2004 acquisition discussed above. We believe the acquired business’ established relationships with broad-line national distributors have enabled us to expand our customer base and provide nationwide distribution capabilities for all of our product lines. As a result, we believe we are one of only two U.S. chicken producers that can supply the growing demand for a broad range of price competitive standard and specialized products with well-known brand names on a nationwide basis from a single source supplier.

- Capitalize on attractive U.S. prepared foods market. We focus our U.S. growth initiatives on sales of prepared foods to the foodservice market because it continues to be one of the fastest growing and most profitable segments in the poultry industry. Products sold to this market segment require further processing, which enables us to charge a premium for our products, reducing the impact of feed ingredient costs on our profitability and improving and stabilizing our profit margins. Feed ingredient costs t ypically decrease from approximately 32%-49% of total production cost for fresh chicken products to approximately 16%-25% for prepared chicken products. Due to increased demand from our foodservice customers and our fiscal 2004 acquisition, our sales of prepared chicken products grew from $641.6 million in fiscal 2000 to $1,896.4 million in fiscal 2004, a compounded annual growth rate of 31.1%. Prepared food sales represented 46.3% of our total U.S. chicken revenues in fiscal year 2004, which we believe provides us with a significant competitive advantage and reduces our exposure to feed price fluctuations. The addition of well-known brands, including Pierce^® and Easy-Entre&#-4088;e^®, from our fiscal 2004 acquisition have significantly expanded Pilgrim’s Pride’s already sizeable prepared foods chicken offerings. Similarly, our acquisition of highly customized cooked chicken products, including breaded cutlets, sizzle strips and Wing-Dings^®, for restaurants and specialty foodservice customers from this acquisition complement our existing lines of pre-cooked breast fillets, tenderloins, burgers, nuggets, salads and other prepared products for institutional foodservice, fast-food and retail customers.

- Emphasize customer-driven research and technology. We have a long-standing reputation for customer-driven research and development in designing new products and implementing advanced processing technology. This enables us to better meet our customers’ changing needs for product innovation, consistent quality and cost efficiency. In particular, customer-driven research and development is integral to our growth strategy for the prepared foods market in which customers continue to place greater importance on value-added services. Our research and development personnel often work directly with customer s in developing products for them, which we believe helps promote long-term relationships.

- Enhance U.S. fresh chicken profitability through value-added, branded products. Our U.S. fresh chicken sales accounted for $1,982.7 million, or 48.5%, of our U.S. chicken sales for fiscal 2004. In addition to maintaining the sales of traditional fresh chicken products, our strategy is to shift the mix of our U.S. fresh chicken products by continuing to increase sales of higher margin, faster growing products, such as fixed weight packaged products and marinated chicken and chicken parts and to continually shift portions of this product mix into the higher value and margin prepared chicken products. Much of our fresh chicken products are sold under the Pilgrim’s Pride^® and Country Pride^® brand names, which are two well-known brands in the chicken industry. With the addition of a Gainesville, Georgia processing plant acquired in the fiscal 2004 acquisition, we added to our capabilities to cut and process case-ready, fixed-weight chicken for major national retail customers who are requesting standardized packaging in order to improve their offerings and inventory controls.

- Improve operating efficiencies and increase capacity on a cost-effective basis. As production and sales grow, we continue to focus on improving operating efficiencies by investing in state-of-the-art technology and processes, training and our total quality management program. Specific initiatives include:

- standardizing lowest-cost production processes across our various facilities;

- centralizing purchasing and other shared services; and

- upgrading technology where appropriate.

In addition, we have a proven history of increasing capacity while improving operating efficiencies at acquired properties both in the U.S. and Mexico. As a result, according to industry data, since 1993 we have consistently been one of the lowest cost producers of chicken in the U.S., and we also believe we are one of the lowest cost producers of chicken in Mexico.

- Continue to seek strategic acquisitions. We have pursued opportunities to expand through acquisitions in the past. We expect to continue to evaluate acquisition opportunities in the future that would either compliment our existing businesses, broaden our production capabilities and/or improve our operating efficiencies.

- Continue to penetrate the growing Mexican market. We seek to leverage our leading market position and reputation for freshness and quality in Mexico by focusing on the following objectives:

- to be one of the most cost-efficient producers and processors of chicken in Mexico by applying technology and expertise utilized in the U.S.;

- to continually increase our distribution of higher margin, more value-added products to national retail stores and restaurants; and

- to continue to build and emphasize brand awareness and capitalize on Mexican consumers’ preference for branded products and their insistence on freshness and quality.

- Leverage our turkey operations. We plan to take advantage of our leading market position, reputation as a high quality, high service provider of chicken products and the recent restructuring of our turkey operations by focusing on the following objectives:

- cross-selling prepared turkey products to existing chicken customers;

- developing new and innovative prepared turkey products by capitalizing on our research and development expertise;

- improving operating efficiencies in our turkey operations by applying proven management methodologies and techniques employed historically in our chicken operations; and

capitalizing on the unique opportunity to establish, develop and market turkey products under the Pilgrim’s Pride^® and Pilgrim’s Signature^TM brand names.

- Capitalize on export opportunities. We intend to continue to focus on international opportunities to complement our U.S. chicken operations and capitalize on attractive export markets. According to the USDA, the export of U.S. chicken products increased 7.3% from 1999 through 2003. We believe U.S. chicken exports will grow as worldwide demand increases for high-grade, low-cost protein sources. According to USDA data, the export market for chicken is expected to grow at a compounded annual growth rate of 2.4% from 2003 to 2008. Historically, we have targeted international markets to generate additional d emand for our chicken dark meat, which is a natural by-product of our U.S. operations given our concentration on prepared foods products and the U.S. customers’ general preference for white meat. As part of this initiative, we have created a significant international distribution network into several markets, including Mexico, which we now utilize not only for dark meat distribution, but also for various higher margin prepared foods and other poultry products. We employ both a direct international sales force and export brokers. Our key international markets include Eastern Europe, including Russia, the Far East and Mexico. We believe that we have substantial opportunities to expand our sales to these markets by capitalizing on direct international distribution channels supplemented by our existing export broker relationships. Our export and other category accounted for approximately 4.8% of our net sales in fiscal 2004.

Products and Markets

Our chicken products consist primarily of:

(1) Prepared chicken products, which are products such as portion-controlled breast fillets, tenderloins and strips, delicatessen products, salads, formed nuggets and patties and bone-in chicken parts. These products are sold either refrigerated or frozen and may be fully cooked, partially cooked or raw. In addition, these products are breaded or non-breaded and either pre-marinated or non-marinated.

(2) Fresh chicken, which is refrigerated (non-frozen) whole or cut-up chicken sold to the foodservice industry either pre-marinated or non-marinated. Fresh chicken also includes prepackaged case-ready chicken, which includes various combinations of freshly refrigerated, whole chickens and chicken parts in trays, bags or other consumer packs labeled and priced ready for the retail grocer's fresh meat counter.

(3) Export and other chicken products, which are primarily parts and whole chicken, either refrigerated or frozen for U.S. export or domestic use, and chicken prepared foods products for U.S. export.

After completion of the restructuring of our turkey operations described above, our turkey products consist primarily of:

(1) Prepared turkey products, which are products such as turkey sausages, ground turkey, turkey hams and roasts, ground turkey breast products, salads and flavored turkey burgers. We also have an array of cooked, further processed deli products.

(2) Fresh turkey, which includes turkey burgers, and fresh and frozen whole birds, as well as semi-boneless whole turkey, which has all bones except the drumsticks removed.

Our chicken and turkey products are sold primarily to:

(1) Foodservice customers, which are customers such as chain restaurants, food processors, foodservice distributors and certain other institutions. We sell products to our foodservice customers ranging from portion-controlled refrigerated poultry parts to fully-cooked and frozen, breaded or non-breaded poultry parts or formed products.

(2) Retail customers, which are customers such as grocery store chains, wholesale clubs and other retail distributors. We sell to our retail customers branded, pre-packaged, cut-up and whole poultry, and fresh refrigerated or frozen whole poultry and poultry parts in trays, bags or other consumer packs.

The following table sets forth, for the periods beginning with fiscal 2000, net sales attributable to each of our primary product lines and markets served with those products. Consistent with our long-term strategy, we emphasized our U.S. growth initiatives on sales of prepared foods products, primarily to the foodservice market. This product and market segment has experienced, and we believe will continue to experience, greater growth than fresh chicken products. We based the table on our internal sales reports and their classification of product types and customers.

	Fiscal Year Ended
		Oct. 2, 2004^(a)		Sept. 27, 2003			Sept. 28, 2002			Sept. 29, 2001^(b)			Sept. 30, 2000
		(53 weeks)		(52 weeks)			(52 weeks)			(52 weeks)			(52 weeks)
U.S. Chicken Sales:	(in thousands)
Prepared Foods:
Foodservice		$	1,647,904		$	731,331		$	659,856		$	632,075		$	589,395
Retail			213,775			163,018			158,299			103,202			47,655
Total Prepared Foods			1,861,679			894,349			818,155			735,277			637,050

Fresh Chicken:
Foodservice			1,328,883			474,251			448,376			387,624			202,192
Retail			653,798			257,911			258,424			224,693			148,977
Total Fresh Chicken			1,982,681			732,162			706,800			612,317			351,169

Export and Other:
Prepared Foods			34,735			26,714			30,528			18,912			4,595
Other Chicken			212,611			85,087			93,575			105,834			57,573
Total Export and Other			247,346			111,801			124,103			124,746			62,168
Total U.S. Chicken			4,091,706			1,738,312			1,649,058			1,472,340			1,050,387

Mexico Chicken Sales:			362,442			349,305			323,769			303,433			285,605
Total Chicken Sales			4,454,148			2,087,617			1,972,827			1,775,773			1,335,992

U.S. Turkey Sales:
Prepared Foods:
Foodservice			80,927			89,957			134,651			88,012			--
Retail			37,384			29,141			54,638			48,681			--
Total Prepared Foods			118,311			119,098			189,289			136,693			--

Fresh Turkey:
Foodservice			39,749			48,448			36,119			18,618			--
Retail			116,905			125,411			107,582			71,647			--
Total Fresh Turkey			156,654			173,859			143,701			90,265			--

Export and Other:
Prepared Foods			1,949			2,128			2,858			2,434			--
Other Turkey			9,338			10,593			12,270			9,443			--
Total Export and Other			11,287			12,721			15,128			11,877			--
Total U.S. Turkey Sales			286,252			305,678			348,118			238,835			--

Sales of Other Products:
United States			600,091			207,284			193,691			179,859			141,690
Mexico			23,232			18,766			19,082			20,245			21,757
Total Sales of Other Products			623,323			226,050			212,773			200,104			163,447

Total Net Sales		$	5,363,723		$	2,619,345		$	2,533,718		$	2,214,712		$	1,499,439

Total Chicken Prepared Foods		$	1,896,414		$	921,063		$	848,683		$	754,189		$	641,645
Total Turkey Prepared Foods			120,260			121,226			192,147			139,127			--

(a) The acquisition of the ConAgra chicken division on November 23, 2003 has been accounted for as a purchase, and the results of operations for this acquisition have been included in our consolidated results of operations since the acquisition date.

(b) The acquisition of WLR Foods on January 27, 2001 has been accounted for as a purchase, and the results of operations for this acquisition have been included in our consolidated results of operations since the acquisition date.

The following table sets forth, beginning with fiscal 2000, the percentage of net U.S. chicken and turkey sales attributable to each of our primary product lines and the markets serviced with those products. We based the table and related discussion on our internal sales reports and their classification of product types and customers.

	Fiscal Year Ended
	Oct. 2, 2004^(a)			Sept. 27, 2003			Sept. 28, 2002			Sept. 29, 2001^(b)			Sept. 30, 2000
U.S. Chicken Sales:
Prepared Foods:
Foodservice		40.3			42.1			39.9			42.9			56.2
Retail		5.2			9.4			9.6			7.0			4.5
Total Prepared Foods		45.5	%		51.5	%		49.5	%		49.9	%		60.7	%

Fresh Chicken:
Foodservice		32.5			27.3			27.2			26.3			19.2
Retail		16.0			14.8			15.7			15.3			14.2
Total Fresh Chicken		48.5	%		42.1	%		42.9	%		41.6	%		33.4	%

Export and Other:
Prepared Foods		0.8			1.5			1.9			1.3			0.4
Other Chicken		5.2			4.9			5.7			7.2			5.5
Total Export and Other		6.0	%		6.4	%		7.6	%		8.5	%		5.9	%
Total U.S. Chicken		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%

U.S. Turkey Sales:
Prepared Foods:
Foodservice		28.2			29.5			38.7			36.8			--
Retail		13.1			9.5			15.7			20.4			--
Total Prepared Foods		41.3	%		39.0	%		54.4	%		57.2	%		--

Fresh Turkey:
Foodservice		13.9			15.8			10.4			7.8			--
Retail		40.8			41.0			30.9			30.0			--
Total Fresh Turkey		54.7	%		56.8	%		41.3	%		37.8	%		--

Export and Other:
Prepared Foods		0.7			0.7			0.8			1.0			--
Other Turkey		3.3			3.5			3.5			4.0			--
Total Export and Other		4.0	%		4.2	%		4.3	%		5.0	%		--
Total U.S. Turkey		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		--

Total Chicken Prepared Foods as a percentage of U.S. Chicken		46.3	%		53.0	%		51.4	%		51.2	%		61.1	%

Total Turkey Prepared Foods as a percentage of U.S. Turkey		42.0	%		39.7	%		55.2	%		58.2	%		--

UNITED STATES

Product Types

Chicken Products

Prepared Foods Overview. During fiscal 2004, $1,861.7 million, or 45.5%, of our U.S. chicken sales were in prepared foods products to foodservice customers and retail distributors, as compared to $637.1 million in fiscal 2000. These numbers reflect the strategic focus for our growth. The market for prepared chicken products has experienced, and we believe will continue to experience, greater growth, higher average sales prices and higher margins than fresh chicken products. Also, the production and sale in the U.S. of prepared foods products reduce the impact of the costs of feed ingredients on our profitability. Feed ingredient costs are the single largest component of our total U.S. cost of goo ds sold, representing approximately 31% of our U.S. cost of goods sold for the fiscal year ended October 2, 2004. The production of feed ingredients is positively or negatively affected primarily by weather patterns throughout the world, the global level of supply inventories, demand for feed ingredients, and the agricultural policies of the U.S. and foreign governments. As further processing is performed, feed ingredient costs become a decreasing percentage of a product’s total production cost, thereby reducing their impact on our profitability. Products sold in this form enable us to charge a premium, reduce the impact of feed ingredient costs on our profitability and improve and stabilize our profit margins.

We establish prices for our prepared chicken products based primarily upon perceived value to the customer, production costs and prices of competing products. The majority of these products are sold pursuant to agreements with varying terms that either set a fixed price for the products or set a price according to formulas based on an underlying commodity market, subject in many cases to minimum and maximum prices.

Fresh Chicken Overview. Our fresh chicken business is an important component of our sales and accounted for $1,982.7 million, or 48.5%, of our total U.S. chicken sales for fiscal 2004. In addition to maintaining sales of mature, traditional fresh chicken products, our strategy is to shift the mix of our U.S. fresh chicken products by continuing to increase sales of higher margin, faster growing products, such as marinated chicken and chicken parts, and to continually shift portions of this product mix into the higher value and margin prepared chicken products.

Most fresh chicken products are sold to established customers, based upon certain weekly or monthly market prices reported by the USDA and other public price reporting services, plus a markup, which is dependent upon the customer’s location, volume, product specifications and other factors. We believe our practices with respect to sales of fresh chicken are generally consistent with those of our competitors. Prices of these products are negotiated daily or weekly.

Export and Other Chicken Products Overview. Our export and other products consist of whole chickens and chicken parts sold primarily in bulk, non-branded form, either refrigerated to distributors in the U.S. or frozen for distribution to export markets, and branded and non-branded prepared foods products for distribution to export markets. In fiscal 2004, approximately $247.3 million, or 6.0%, of our total U.S. chicken sales were attributable to U.S. chicken export and other products. These exports and other products, other than the prepared foods products, have historically been characterized by lower prices and greater price volatility than our more value-added product lines.

Turkey Products

Prepared Foods Overview. During fiscal 2004, $118.3 million, or 41.3%, of our total U.S turkey sales were prepared turkey products sold to foodservice customers and retail distributors. Like the U.S. chicken markets, the market for prepared turkey products has experienced greater growth and higher margins than fresh turkey products, and the production and sale of prepared turkey products reduces the impact of the costs of feed ingredients on our profitability. Feed ingredient costs are the single largest component of our turkey division’s cost of goods sold, representing approximately 44% of our turkey cost of goods sold in fiscal 2004. Similarly with the chicken business, as further process ing is performed, feed ingredient costs become a decreasing percentage of a product’s total production cost, thereby reducing their impact on our profitability.

We establish prices for our prepared turkey products based primarily upon perceived value to the customer, production costs and prices of competing products. The majority of these products are sold pursuant to agreements with varying terms that either set a fixed price or are subject to a market driven formula.

Fresh Turkey Overview. Our fresh turkey business accounted for $156.7 million, or 54.7%, of our total U.S. turkey sales in fiscal 2004. As is typical for the industry, a significant portion of the sales of fresh and frozen whole turkeys is seasonal in nature, with the height of sales occurring during the Thanksgiving and Christmas holidays. In addition to maintaining sales of mature, traditional fresh turkey products, our strategy is to shift the mix of our fresh turkey products by increasing sales of higher margin, faster growing value-added prepared turkey products, such as deli meats, ground turkey, turkey burgers and sausage, roasted turkey and salads.

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, we sold our turkey processing operations in Hinton, Virginia. The production from this facility, in addition to supplying product to our further processing operations, provided products that were sold primarily as commodity products. Our remaining processing facility is focused on producing a premium line of fresh and frozen whole turkeys. We estimate that the restructuring of our turkey operations will decrease our fiscal 2005 commodity turkey sales by approximately $70 million.

Most fresh turkey products are sold to established customers pursuant to agreements with varying terms that either set a fixed price or are subject to a market driven formula with some agreements based upon market prices reported by the USDA and other public price reporting services, plus a markup, which is dependent upon the customer’s location, volume, product specifications and other factors. We believe our practices with respect to sales of fresh turkey are generally consistent with those of our competitors with similar programs. Prices of these products are generally negotiated daily or weekly.

Export and Other Turkey Products Overview. Prior to the restructuring of our turkey operations, our export and other turkey products consisted primarily of turkey parts sold in bulk, non-branded form, frozen for distribution to export markets. In fiscal 2004, approximately $11.3 million, or 4.0%, of our total U.S. turkey sales were attributable to export and other sales. These exports and other products have historically been characterized by lower prices and greater price volatility than our value-added product lines. Since the restructuring of our turkey operations, exports of turkey products have been negligible.

Markets for Chicken Products

Foodservice. The majority of our U.S. chicken sales are derived from products sold to the foodservice market. This market principally consists of chain restaurants, food processors and certain other institutions located throughout the continental U.S. We supply chicken products ranging from portion-controlled refrigerated chicken parts to fully cooked and frozen, breaded or non-breaded chicken parts or formed products.

We believe Pilgrim’s Pride is well-positioned to be the primary or secondary supplier to many national and international chain restaurants who require multiple suppliers of chicken products. Additionally, we believe we are well suited to be the sole supplier for many regional chain restaurants. Regional chain restaurants often offer better margin opportunities and a growing base of business.

With the integration of the ConAgra chicken division we are now a significant supplier to the broadline distributor segment which rounds out our foodservice offerings to allow us to service the entire foodservice industry.

We believe we have significant competitive strengths in terms of full-line product capabilities, high-volume production capacities, research and development expertise and extensive distribution and marketing experience relative to smaller and non-vertically integrated producers. While the overall chicken market has grown consistently, we believe the majority of this growth in recent years has been in the foodservice market. According to the National Chicken Council, from 1999 through 2003, sales of chicken products to the foodservice market grew at a compounded annual growth rate of approximately 4.7%, versus 4.3% growth for the chicken industry overall. Foodservice growth is anticipated to continue as food-away-from-home expenditures continue to outpace overall industry rates. According to the National Restaur ant Association, food-away-from-home expenditures grew at a compounded annual growth rate of approximately 4.1% from 1999 through 2003 and are projected to grow at a 4.6% compounded annual growth rate from 2003 through 2010. As a result, the food-away-from-home category is projected by the National Restaurant Association to account for 53% of total food expenditures by 2010, as compared with the current amount of 46.1%. Due to internal growth and our fiscal 2004 acquisition, our sales to the foodservice market from fiscal 2000 through fiscal 2004 grew at a compounded annual growth rate of 39.2% and represented 72.8% of the net sales of our U.S. chicken operations in fiscal 2004.

Foodservice - Prepared Foods. The majority of our sales to the foodservice market consist of prepared foods products. Our prepared chicken products sales to the foodservice market were $1,647.9 million in fiscal 2004 compared to $589.4 million in fiscal 2000, a compounded annual growth rate of approximately 29.2%. In addition to the significant increase in sales created by the fiscal 2004 acquisition, we attribute this growth in sales of prepared chicken products to the foodservice market to a number of factors:

First, there has been significant growth in the number of foodservice operators offering chicken on their menus and in the number of chicken items offered.

Second, foodservice operators are increasingly purchasing prepared chicken products, which allow them to reduce labor costs while providing greater product consistency, quality and variety across all restaurant locations.

Third, there is a strong need among larger foodservice companies for an alternative or additional supplier to our principal competitor in the prepared chicken products market. A viable alternative supplier must be able to ensure supply, demonstrate innovation and new product development and provide competitive pricing. We have been successful in our objective of becoming the alternative supplier of choice by being the primary or secondary prepared chicken products supplier to many large foodservice companies because:

- We are vertically integrated, giving us control over our supply of chicken and chicken parts;

- Our further processing facilities with a wide range of capabilities are particularly well suited to the high-volume production as well as low-volume custom production runs necessary to meet both the capacity and quality requirements of the foodservice market; and

- We have established a reputation for dependable quality, highly responsive service and

excellent technical support.

Fourth, as a result of the experience and reputation developed with larger customers, we have increasingly become the principal supplier to mid-sized foodservice organizations.

Fifth, our in-house product development group follows a customer-driven research and development focus designed to develop new products to meet customers’ changing needs. Our research and development personnel often work directly with institutional customers in developing products for these customers.

Sixth, we are a leader in utilizing advanced processing technology, which enables us to better meet our customers’ needs for product innovation, consistent quality and cost efficiency.

Foodservice - Fresh Chicken. We produce and market fresh, refrigerated chicken for sale to U.S. quick-service restaurant chains, delicatessens and other customers. These chickens have the giblets removed, are usually of specific weight ranges, and are usually pre-cut to customer specifications. They are often marinated to enhance value and product differentiation. By growing and processing to customers’ specifications, we are able to assist quick-service restaurant chains in controlling costs and maintaining quality and size consistency of chicken pieces sold to the consumer.

Retail. The retail market consists primarily of grocery store chains, wholesale clubs and other retail distributors. We concentrate our efforts in this market on sales of branded, prepackaged cut-up and whole chicken to grocery store chains and retail distributors in the midwestern, southwestern, western and eastern regions of the U.S. This regional marketing focus enables us to develop consumer brand franchises and capitalize on proximity to the trade customer in terms of lower transportation costs, more timely and responsive service, and enhanced product freshness. For a number of years, we have invested in both trade and retail marketing designed to establish high levels of brand name awarenes s and consumer preferences.

We utilize numerous marketing techniques, including advertising, to develop and strengthen trade and consumer awareness and increase brand loyalty for consumer products marketed under the Pilgrim’s Pride^® brand. Our founder, Lonnie "Bo" Pilgrim, is the featured spokesman in our television, radio and print advertising, and a trademark cameo of a person wearing a Pilgrim’s hat serves as the logo on all of our primary branded products. As a result of this marketing strategy, Pilgrim’s Pride^® is a well-known brand name in a number of markets. We believe our efforts to achieve and maintain brand awareness and loyalty help

to provide more secure distribution for our products. We also believe our efforts at brand awareness generate greater price premiums than would otherwise be the case in certain southwestern markets. We also maintain an active program to identify consumer preferences. The program primarily consists of discovering and validating new product ideas, packaging designs and methods through sophisticated qualitative and quantitative consumer research techniques in key geographic markets.

Retail - Prepared Foods. We sell retail-oriented prepared chicken products primarily to grocery store chains located in the midwestern, southwestern, western and eastern regions of the U.S. Our prepared chicken products sales to the retail market were $213.8 million in fiscal 2004 compared to $47.7 million in fiscal 2000, a compounded annual growth rate of approximately 45.5%. We believe that our growth in this market segment will continue as retailers concentrate on satisfying consumer demand for more products which are quick, easy and convenient to prepare at home.

Retail - Fresh Chicken. Our prepackaged retail products include various combinations of freshly refrigerated, whole chickens and chicken parts in trays, bags or other consumer packs labeled and priced ready for the retail grocer’s fresh meat counter. We believe the retail prepackaged fresh chicken business will continue to be a large and relatively stable market, providing opportunities for product differentiation and regional brand loyalty.

Export and Other Chicken Products. Our export and other chicken products, other than the prepared foods products, consist of whole chickens and chicken parts sold primarily in bulk, non-branded form either refrigerated to distributors in the U.S. or frozen for distribution to export markets. In the U.S., prices of these products are negotiated daily or weekly and are generally related to market prices quoted by the USDA or other public price reporting services. We also sell U.S.-produced chicken products for export to Eastern Europe, including Russia, the Far East, Mexico and other world markets. On March 10, 2002, Russia announced it was imposing a ban on the importing of U.S. poultry products. Russia accounted for approximately 31% of all U.S. chicken exports in 2002, or approximately 5% of the total U.S. chicken production. On April 10, 2002, Russia announced the lifting of the import ban. On September 15, 2002, new sanitary guidelines were established by Russia that require veterinary specialists from the Agriculture Ministry of Russia to inspect and certify plants of U.S. poultry producers interested in exporting to Russia. As of November 24, 2004, six of our locations had been certified by the Agriculture Ministry for export into Russia and three additional locations have been re-inspected and we are waiting on notice of their certification by the Agriculture Ministry. We currently may export from three of our six certified locations and we may begin exporting to Russia from our other three certified locations after Russia lifts the current Avian Influenza ban on December 23, 2004. U.S. markets continue to be affected as Russia continues to restrict the import of U.S. poultry products below 20 02 levels.

Historically, we have targeted international markets to generate additional demand for our chicken dark meat, which is a natural by-product of our U.S. operations given our concentration on prepared foods products and the U.S. customers’ general preference for white meat. We have also begun selling prepared chicken products for export to the international divisions of our U.S. chain restaurant customers. We believe that U.S. chicken exports will continue to grow as worldwide demand increases for high-grade, low-cost protein sources. We also believe that worldwide demand for higher margin prepared foods products will increase over the next several years. Accordingly, we believe we are well positioned to capitalize on such growth. Also included in these categories are chicken by-products, which are converted into protein products and sold primarily to manufacturers of pet foods.

Markets for Turkey Products

Foodservice. A portion of our turkey sales are derived from products sold to the foodservice market. This market principally consists of chain restaurants, food processors, foodservice distributors and certain other institutions located throughout the continental U.S. After completion of the restructuring of our turkey operations described above, our turkey products include ready-to-cook turkey, fully cooked formed products, delicatessen products such as deli meats and sausage, salads, ground turkey and turkey burgers and other foodservice products.

We believe Pilgrim’s Pride is well-positioned to be the primary or secondary supplier to many chain restaurants that require multiple suppliers of turkey products. Additionally, we believe we are well suited to be the sole supplier for many regional chain restaurants.

Foodservice - Prepared Foods. The majority of our turkey sales to the foodservice market consist of prepared turkey products. Our prepared turkey sales to the foodservice market were $80.9 million of our sales in fiscal 2004. We believe that future growth in this segment will be attributable to the factors described above relating to the growth of prepared chicken sales to the foodservice market.

Foodservice - Fresh Turkey. We produce and market fresh, refrigerated and frozen turkey for sale to foodservice distributors, restaurant chains and other customers. These turkeys are usually of specific weight ranges and are usually whole birds to meet customer specifications. They are often marinated to enhance value and product differentiation.

Retail. A significant portion of our turkey sales is derived from products sold to the retail market. This market consists primarily of grocery store chains, wholesale clubs and other retail distributors. We concentrate our efforts in this market on sales of branded, prepackaged whole turkey to grocery store chains and retail distributors in the eastern and southwestern regions of the U.S. We believe this regional marketing focus enables us to develop consumer brand franchises and capitalize on proximity to the trade customer in terms of lower transportation costs, more timely and responsive service and enhanced product freshness.

We utilize numerous marketing techniques, including advertising, to develop and strengthen trade and consumer awareness and increase brand loyalty for consumer products marketed generally under the Pilgrim’s Pride^® and Pilgrim’s Signature^TM brands. We believe our efforts to achieve and maintain brand awareness and loyalty help to provide more secure distribution for our products. We also believe our efforts at brand awa reness generate greater price premiums than would otherwise be the case in certain eastern markets. We also maintain an active program to identify consumer preferences. The program primarily consists of testing new product ideas, packaging designs and methods through sophisticated qualititative and quantitative consumer research techniques in key geographic markets.

Retail - Prepared Foods. We sell retail-oriented prepared turkey products primarily to grocery store chains located in the eastern U.S. We also sell these products to the wholesale club industry.

Retail - Fresh Turkey. Our prepackaged, retail products include various combinations of freshly refrigerated and frozen whole turkey in bags as well as frozen ground turkey and turkey burgers. We believe the retail prepackaged fresh turkey business will continue to be a large and relatively stable market, providing opportunities for product differentiation and regional brand loyalty with large seasonal spikes during the holiday seasons.

Markets for Other U.S. Products

We have regional distribution centers located in Arizona, California, Iowa, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, Texas, Utah and Wisconsin that distribute our own poultry products, along with certain poultry and non-poultry products purchased from third parties, to independent grocers and quick service restaurants. Our non-poultry distribution business is conducted as an accommodation to our customers and to achieve greater economies of scale in distribution logistics. We believe the store-door delivery capabilities for our own poultry products provide a strategic service advantage in selling to quick service, national chain restaurants.

We market fresh eggs under the Pilgrim’s Pride^® brand name, as well as under private labels, in various sizes of cartons and flats to U.S. retail grocery and institutional foodservice customers located primarily in Texas. We have a housing capacity for approximately 2.3 million commercial egg laying hens which can produce approximately 42 million dozen eggs annually. U.S. egg prices are determined weekly based upon reported market prices. The U.S. egg industry has been consolidating over the last few years, with the 25 largest producers accounting for more than 62.6% of the total number of egg laying hens in serv ice during 2004. We compete with other U.S. egg producers primarily on the basis of product quality, reliability, price and customer service.

We market a high-nutrient egg called EggsPlus™. This egg contains high levels of Omega-3 and Omega-6 fatty acids along with Vitamin E, making the egg a heart-friendly product. Our marketing of EggsPlus™ has received national recognition for our progress in being an innovator in the "functional foods" category.

In addition, we produce and sell livestock feeds at our feed mill in Mt. Pleasant, Texas and at our farm supply store in Pittsburg, Texas to dairy farmers and livestock producers in northeastern Texas. We engage in similar sales activities at our other U.S. feed mills.

MEXICO

Background

The Mexican market represented approximately 7.2% of our net sales in fiscal 2004. We are the second largest producer of chicken in Mexico. We believe that our facilities are among the most technologically advanced in Mexico and that we are one of the lowest cost producers of chicken in Mexico.

Product Types

While the market for chicken products in Mexico is less developed than in the U.S., with sales attributed to fewer, more basic products, we believe the market for value-added products is increasing. Our strategy is to lead this trend. We have increased our sales of value-added products, primarily through national retail chains and restaurants, and it is our business strategy to continue to do so.

Markets

We sell our Mexico chicken products primarily to large wholesalers and retailers. Our customer base in Mexico covers a broad geographic area from Mexico City, the capital of Mexico with a population estimated to be over 22 million, to Saltillo, the capital of the State of Coahuila, about 500 miles north of Mexico City, and from Tampico and Veracruz on the Gulf of Mexico to Acapulco on the Pacific, which region includes the cities of San Luis Potosi and Queretaro, capitals of the states of the same name, and Cancun on the Caribbean.

Foreign Operations Risks

Our foreign operations pose special risks to our business and operations. See "Risk Factors" in Item 7A. "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk" for a discussion of foreign operations risks.

GENERAL

Competition

The chicken and turkey industries are highly competitive and some of our competitors have greater financial and marketing resources than we do. In the U.S. and Mexico, we compete principally with other vertically integrated chicken and turkey companies.

In general, the competitive factors in the U.S. chicken and turkey industries include price, product quality, product development, brand identification, breadth of product line and customer service. Competitive factors vary by major market. In the foodservice market, competition is based on consistent quality, product development, service and price. In the U.S. retail market, we believe that product quality, brand awareness, customer service and price are the primary bases of competition. There is some competition with non-vertically integrated further processors in the U.S. prepared food business. We believe vertical integration generally provides significant, long-term cost and quality advantages over non-vertically integrated further processors.

In Mexico, where product differentiation has traditionally been limited, product quality, service and price have been the most critical competitive factors. The North American Free Trade Agreement, which went into effect on January 1, 1994, required annual reductions in tariffs for chicken and chicken products in order to eliminate those tariffs by January 1, 2003. On November 21, 2002 the Mexican Secretariat of the Economy announced it would initiate an investigation to determine whether a temporary safeguard action was warranted to protect the domestic poultry industry when import tariffs on poultry were eliminated in January 2003. The action stemmed from concerns of the Union Nacional Avicultores (UNA) that duty-free imports of leg quarters would injure the Mexico poultry industry. In July 2003, the U.S. and Mexico entered into a safeguard agreement with regard to imports into Mexico of chicken leg quarters from the U.S.

Under this agreement, a tariff rate for chicken leg quarters of 98.8% of the sales price was established. The first reduction to the tariff rate occurred in January 2004, reducing the import duties to 79.4%, and in each of the following four years the tariff rate is to be reduced in equal increments so that the final tariff rate on January 1, 2008 will be zero. As such tariffs are reduced, we expect greater amounts of chicken to be imported into Mexico from the U.S., which could negatively affect the profitability of Mexican chicken producers and positively affect the profitability of U.S. exporters of chicken to Mexico. Although th is could have a negative impact on our Mexican chicken operations, we believe that this will be mitigated by the close proximity of our U.S. operations to the Mexican border. We have the largest U.S. production and distribution capacities near the Mexican border, which gives us a strategic advantage to capitalize on exports of U.S. chicken to Mexico.

While the extent of the impact of the elimination of tariffs is uncertain, we believe we are uniquely positioned to benefit from this elimination for two reasons. First, we have an extensive distribution network in Mexico, which distributes products to 28 of the 32 Mexican states, encompassing approximately 83% of the total population of Mexico. We believe this distribution network will be an important asset in distributing our own, as well as other companies’, U.S. produced chicken into Mexico. Second, we have the largest U.S. production and distribution capacities near the Mexican border, which will provide us with cost advantages in exporting U.S. chicken into Mexico. These facilities include our processing facilities in Mt. Pl easant, Lufkin, Nacogdoches, Dallas and Waco, Texas, and distribution facilities in San Antonio and El Paso, Texas and Phoenix, Arizona.

Other Activities

Regulation and Environmental Matters

The chicken and turkey industries are subject to government regulation, particularly in the health and environmental areas, including provisions relating to the discharge of materials into the environment, by the Centers for Disease Control ("CDC"), the USDA, the Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") and the Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") in the U.S. and by similar governmental agencies in Mexico. Our chicken processing facilities in the U.S. are subject to on-site examination, inspection and regulation by the USDA. The FDA inspects the production of our feed mills in the U.S. Our Mexican food processing facilities and feed mills are subject to on-site examination, inspection and regulation by a Mexican governmental agency, which performs functions similar to those performed by the USDA and FDA. We beli eve that we are in substantial compliance with all applicable laws and regulations relating to the operations of our facilities.

We anticipate increased regulation by the USDA concerning food safety, by the FDA concerning the use of medications in feed and by the EPA and various other state agencies concerning discharges to the environment. Although, we do not anticipate any regulations having a material adverse effect upon us, a material adverse effect may occur.

Employees and Labor Relations

As of October 2, 2004, we employed approximately 35,500 persons in the U.S. and 4,800 persons in Mexico. Approximately 12,700 employees at various facilities in the U. S. are members of collective bargaining units. In Mexico, most of our hourly employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements, as are most employees in Mexico. We have not experienced any work stoppage at any location in over five years. We believe our relations with our employees are satisfactory. At any given time we will be in some stage of contract negotiation with various collective bargaining units.

Business Segments

We operate in two reportable business segments as (1) a producer of chicken and other products and (2) a producer of turkey products. See a discussion of our business segments in Item 7. "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."

Executive Officers

Set forth below is certain information relating to our current executive officers:

Name	Age	Positions
Lonnie "Bo" Pilgrim	76	Chairman of the Board
Clifford E. Butler	62	Vice Chairman of the Board
O.B. Goolsby, Jr.	57	President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director
J. Clinton Rivers	45	Chief Operating Officer
Richard A. Cogdill	44	Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
		Secretary, Treasurer and Director
Robert A. Wright	50	Executive Vice President of
		Sales and Marketing

Lonnie "Bo" Pilgrim has served as Chairman of the Board since the organization of Pilgrim's Pride in July 1968. He was previously Chief Executive Officer from July 1968 to June 1998. Prior to the incorporation of Pilgrim's Pride, Mr. Pilgrim was a partner in its predecessor partnership business founded in 1946.

Clifford E. Butler serves as Vice Chairman of the Board. He joined us as Controller and Director in 1969, was named Senior Vice President of Finance in 1973, became Chief Financial Officer and Vice Chairman of the Board in July 1983, became Executive President in January 1997 and served in such capacity through July 1998.

O.B. Goolsby, Jr. serves as President and Chief Executive Officer of Pilgrim’s Pride. Prior to being named Chief Executive Officer in September 2004, Mr. Goolsby served as President and Chief Operating Officer since November 2002. Mr. Goolsby served as Executive Vice President, Prepared Foods Complexes from June 1998 to November 2002. He was previously Senior Vice President, Prepared Foods Operations from August 1992 to June 1998 and Vice President, Prepared Foods Complexes from September 1987 to August 1992 and was previously employed by us from November 1969 to January 1981.

J. Clinton Rivers serves as Chief Operating Officer. Prior to being named Chief Operating Officer in October 2004, Mr. Rivers served as Executive Vice President of Prepared Food Operations from November 2002 to October 2004. He was the Senior Vice President of Prepared Foods Operations from 1999 to November 2002, and was the Vice President of Prepared Foods Operations from 1992 to 1999. From 1989 to 1992, he served as Plant Manager of the Mount Pleasant, Texas Production Facility. He joined Pilgrim’s Pride in 1986 as the Quality Assurance Manager, and also held positions at Perdue Farms and Golden West Foods.

Richard A. Cogdill has served as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer since January 1997. He became a Director in September 1998. Previously he served as Senior Vice President, Corporate Controller, from August 1992 through December 1996 and as Vice President, Corporate Controller from October 1991 through August 1992. Prior to October 1991, he was a Senior Manager with Ernst & Young LLP. He is a Certified Public Accountant.

Robert A. Wright serves as Executive Vice President of Sales and Marketing. Prior to being named Executive Vice President of Sales and Marketing in June 2004, Mr. Wright served as Executive Vice President, Turkey Division since October 2003 when he joined Pilgrim’s Pride. Prior to October 2003, Mr. Wright served as President of Butterball Turkey Company for five years.

Item 2. Properties

Operating Facilities

We operate 23 poultry processing plants in the U.S. Of this total, 22 process chicken and are located in Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, North Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and West Virginia. We have one turkey processing plant in Pennsylvania, one chicken processing plant in Puerto Rico and three chicken processing plants in Mexico. The U.S. chicken processing plants have weekly capacity to process 27.5 million broilers and operated at 96% of capacity in fiscal 2004. Our remaining turkey plant has the weekly capacity to process 0.2 million birds under current inspection and line configurations and operates at 90% of capacity. Our Mexico facilities have the capacity to process 3.3 million broilers per week and operated at 91% of capacity in fiscal 2004. Our Puerto Rico processing plant has the capacity to process 0.3 million birds per week based on one eight-hour shift per day. For segment reporting purposes, we include Puerto Rico with our U.S. operations.

In the U.S., the processing plants are supported by 26 hatcheries, 20 feedmills and 8 rendering plants. The hatcheries, feedmills and rendering plants operated at 92%, 85% and 90% of capacity, respectively, in fiscal 2004. In Puerto Rico the processing plant is supported by one hatchery and one feedmill which operated at 87% and 85% of capacity, respectively, in fiscal 2004. Excluding commercial feed products, the Puerto Rico feedmill is running at 60% of capacity. In Mexico the processing plants are supported by seven hatcheries, four feedmills, and two rendering facilities. The Mexico hatcheries, feedmills and rendering facilities operated at 98%, 86% and 82% of capacity, respectively, in fiscal 2004.

We also operate nine prepared foods plants, eight of which process chicken products and one processes turkey products. These plants are located in Georgia, Louisiana, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas and West Virginia. These plants have the capacity to produce approximately 992 million pounds of further processed product per year and in fiscal 2004 operated at approximately 86% of capacity based on the current product mix and six-day production at most facilities and 24/7 production at two facilities.

Other Facilities and Information

We own a partially automated distribution freezer located outside of Pittsburg, Texas, which includes 125,000 square feet of storage area. We operate a commercial feed mill in Mt. Pleasant, Texas. We own an office building in Pittsburg, Texas, which houses our executive offices, and an office building outside of Pittsburg, Texas, which houses our Logistics and Customer Service offices, an office building in Mexico City, which houses our Mexican marketing offices, and an office building in Broadway, Virginia, which houses additional sales and marketing, research and development, and support activities. We lease offices in Dallas, Texas and Duluth, Georgia, which house additional sales and marketing and support activities.

We have regional distribution centers located in Arizona, California, Iowa, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, Texas, Utah and Wisconsin. We have 18 regional distribution centers, nine of which we own and nine of which are leased.

Substantially all of our U.S. property, plant and equipment, except those in our turkey segment, are pledged as collateral on our revolving term loan and our secured term loan.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

On July 1, 2002, three individuals, on behalf of themselves and a putative class of chicken growers, filed their original class action complaint against us in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Texarkana Division, styled "Cody Wheeler, et al. vs. Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation." The complaint alleges that we violated the Packers and Stockyards Act (7 U.S.C. Section 192) and breached fiduciary duties allegedly owed to the plaintiff growers. The plaintiffs also brought individual actions under the Packers and Stockyards Act alleging common law fraud, negligence, breach of fiduciary duties and breach of contract. The plaintiffs entered into an agreement to stay any certification of the class pending the outcome of the trial of the three plaintiffs, Cody Wheeler, Don Davis and Dave y Williams. On March 14, 2003, the court entered an order dismissing the plaintiffs’ claim of breach of fiduciary duty and negligence. The plaintiffs also dropped the charges of fraud prior to the entering of the order by the court. We intend to defend vigorously both certification of the case as a class action should it not prevail in the trial of the three plaintiffs and questions concerning ultimate liability and damages, if any. We do not expect this matter to have a material impact on our financial position, operations or liquidity.

In October 2002, a limited number of USDA environmental samples from our Franconia, Pennsylvania plant tested positive for Listeria. As a result, we voluntarily recalled all cooked deli products produced at the plant from May 1, 2002 through October 11, 2002. No illnesses have been linked to any of our recalled products, and none of such products have tested positive for the strain of Listeria associated with an outbreak in the Northeastern U.S. that occurred during the summer of 2002. However, following this recall, a number of demands and cases have been made and filed alleging injuries purportedly arising from the consumption of products produced at this facility. These include: "Lawese Drayton, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Raymond Drayton, deceased, Plaintiff, v. Pilgrim's Pri de Corporation, Jack Lambersky Poultry Company, Inc. d/b/a JL Foods Co, Inc., Defendants," which was filed against us in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on April 15, 2003; "Laron Harvey, by his mother and natural guardian, Shakandra Hampton, and Shakandra Hampton in her own right v. Pilgrim's Pride Corporation and Jack Lambersky Poultry Company, Inc.," which was filed in the Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas on May 5, 2003, and has since been removed to the U.S. District Court of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia; "Ryan and Dana Patterson v. Pilgrim's Pride Corporation and Jack Lambersky Poultry Company, et al" which was filed in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Passaic County, on August 12, 2003; "Jamar Clarke, an infant under the age of fourteen (14) years, by his mother and natural guardian, Wanda Multrie Clarke, and Wanda Multrie Clarke, individually v. Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation d/b/a Wampler Foods, Inc., H. Schrier and C o., Inc., Board of Education of the City of New York and Public School 251" which was filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Queens, on August 1, 2003; "Peter Roselle, as Administrator and Prosequendum for the heirs-at-Law of Louis P. Roselle, deceased; and Executor of the Estate of Louis P. Roselle, deceased, and individually v. Pilgrim's Pride Corporation, Wampler Foods, Inc., Jack Lambersky Poultry Company, Inc., d.b.a. J.L. Foods Co. Inc." which was filed in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Union County, on June 14, 2004; "Jody Levonchuk, administratrix of the Estate of Joseph Cusato v. Pilgrim's Pride Corporation and Jack Lambersky Poultry Company." which was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, on July 28, 2004; "Mary Samudovsky v. Pilgrim's Pride Corp oration and Jack Lambersky Poultry Company, Inc., et al," which was filed in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division: Camden County, and served on October 26, 2004; Nancy Cirigliano and Scott Fischer v. Pilgrim's Pride Corporation and Jack Lambersky Poultry Company, et al," which was filed in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Union County, on August 10, 2004; "Dennis Wysocki, as the Administrator of the Estate of Matthew Tyler Wysocki, deceased, and Dennis Wysocki and Karen Wysocki, individually v. Pilgrim's Pride Corporation and Jack Lambersky Poultry Company, et al," which was filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, on July 30, 2004; "Randi Carden v. Pilgrim's Pride Corporation and Jack Lambersky Poultry Company, et al," which was filed in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Camden County, on August 10, 2004; and "Catherine Dillon, individually and as guardian ad litem for her infant son, Brian Dillon, and Joseph Dillon, individually" v. Pilgrim's Pride Corporation and Jack Lambersky Poultry Company, et al," which was filed in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Essex County, on September 10, 2004. There is also a pending claim by the Estate of Frank Niemtzow from the previously filed and voluntarily dismissed class action suit. Neither the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome nor the amount of ultimate liability, if any, with respect to any of these cases can be determined at this time. These cases are in various stages of litigation, and we believe we have meritorious defenses to each of the claims, which we intend to vigorously defend. After considering our available insurance coverage, we do not expect any of these matters to have a material impact on our financial position, operations or liquidity.

On December 31, 2003, we were served with a purported class action complaint styled "Angela Goodwin, Gloria Willis, Johnny Gill, Greg Hamilton, Nathan Robinson, Eddie Gusby, Pat Curry, Persons Similarly Situated v. ConAgra Poultry Company and Pilgrim's Pride, Incorporated" in the United States District Court, Western District of Arkansas, El Dorado Division, alleging racial and age discrimination at one of the facilities we acquired from ConAgra. One of the named plaintiffs, Gloria Willis, was voluntarily dismissed from this action. We believe we have meritorious defenses to the class certification as well as the individual claims and we intend to vigorously oppose class certification and defend these claims. However, the ultimate liability with respect to these claims cannot be determined at this time.

We are subject to various other legal proceedings and claims, which arise in the ordinary course of our business. In the opinion of management, the amount of ultimate liability with respect to these actions will not materially affect our financial position or results of operations.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

Not Applicable.

PART II

Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

Quarterly Stock Prices and Dividends

High and low prices of and dividends relating to the Company’s common stock and the Class B and Class A common stock for the periods indicated were:

	Prices 2004						Prices 2003						Dividends
Quarter	High			Low			High			Low			2004			2003

PPC Common Stock
First		$	18.50		$	13.44		$	--		$	--		$	.015		$	--
Second			23.10			16.17			--			--			.015			--
Third			29.88			21.10			--			--			.015			--
Fourth			32.09			23.02			--			--			.015			--

Class B Common Stock
First		$	14.39		$	12.50		$	9.60		$	5.28		$	--		$	.015
Second			--			--			8.79			7.09			--			.015
Third			--			--			9.18			7.98			--			.015
Fourth			--			--			13.80			9.52			--			.015

Class A Common Stock
First		$	14.55		$	12.53		$	7.15		$	4.01		$	--		$	.015
Second			--			--			6.24			4.94			--			.015
Third			--			--			7.06			5.52			--			.015
Fourth			--			--			13.65			7.18			--			.015

The Company’s common stock (ticker symbol "PPC") is traded on the New York Stock Exchange. The Company estimates there were approximately 38,100 holders (including individual participants in security position listings) of the Company’s common stock as of November 10, 2004. Prior to November 22, 2003, the Company had two classes of authorized and issued common stock, Class B common stock (ticker symbol "CHX") and Class A common stock (ticker symbol "CHX A"), both of which were traded on the New York Stock Exchange. See Note H#@*#225;Common Stock of the notes to consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein for additional discussion of the Company’s common stock.

With the exception of two quarters in 1993, the Company's Board of Directors has declared cash dividends of $0.015 per share of common stock (on a split adjusted basis) every fiscal quarter since the Company's initial public offering in 1986. Payment of future dividends will depend upon the Company's financial condition, results of operations and other factors deemed relevant by the Company's Board of Directors, as well as any limitations imposed by lenders under the Company's credit facilities. The Company's revolving credit facility and revolving/term borrowing facility currently limit dividends to a maximum of $6.5 million per year. See Note F - Notes Payable and Long-Term Debt of the notes to consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein for additional discussions of the Company's credit facil ities.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

(In thousands, except ratios and per share data)	Eleven Years Ended October 2, 2004
	2004(a)(b)			2003			2002			2001(c)			2000			1999
	(53 weeks)															(53 weeks)
Income Statement Data:
Net sales	$	5,363,723		$	2,619,345		$	2,533,718		$	2,214,712		$	1,499,439		$	1,357,403
Gross profit(d)		510,101			200,483			165,165			213,950			165,828			185,708
Operating income(d)		265,314			63,613			29,904			94,542			80,488			109,504
Interest expense, net		52,129			37,981			32,003			30,775			17,779			17,666
Income (loss) before income taxes(d)		208,535			63,235			1,910			61,861			62,786			90,904
Income tax expense (benefit)(e)		80,195			7,199			(12,425	)		20,724			10,442			25,651
Net income (loss)		128,340			56,036			14,335			41,137			52,344			65,253
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(f)		4.01x			2.20x			(f	)		2.13x			3.04x			4.33x
Per Common Share Data:(g)
Net income (loss)	$	2.05		$	1.36		$	0.35		$	1.00		$	1.27		$	1.58
Cash dividends		0.06			0.06			0.06			0.06			0.06			0.045
Book value		13.87			10.46			9.59			9.27			8.33			7.11
Balance Sheet Summary:
Working capital	$	383,726		$	211,119		$	179,037		$	203,350		$	124,531		$	154,242
Total assets		2,245,989			1,257,484			1,227,890			1,215,695			705,420			655,762
Notes payable and current maturities of long-term debt		8,428			2,680			3,483			5,099			4,657			4,353
Long-term debt, less current maturities		535,866			415,965			450,161			467,242			165,037			183,753
Total stockholders’ equity		922,956			446,696			394,324			380,932			342,559			294,259
Cash Flow Summary:
Operating cash flow	$	272,404		$	98,892		$	98,113		$	87,833		$	130,803		$	$81,452
Depreciation & amortization(h)		113,788			74,187			70,973			55,390			36,027			34,536
Capital expenditures		79,642			53,574			80,388			112,632			92,128			69,649
Business acquisitions, net of equity consideration(a)(c)		272,097			4,499			--			239,539			--			--
Financing activities, net provided by (used in)		96,665			(39,767	)		(21,793	)		246,649			(24,769	)		(19,634	)
Other Data:
EBITDA(i)	$	372,501		$	173,926		$	103,469		$	146,166		$	115,356		$	142,043
Key Indicators (as a percentage of net sales):
Gross profit		9.5	%		7.7	%		6.5	%		9.7	%		11.1	%		13.7	%
Selling, general and administrative expenses		4.4	%		5.2	%		5.3	%		5.4	%		5.7	%		5.6	%
Operating income (loss)		4.9	%		2.4	%		1.2	%		4.3	%		5.4	%		8.1	%
Interest expense, net		1.0	%		1.5	%		1.3	%		1.4	%		1.2	%		1.3	%
Net income (loss)		2.4	%		2.1	%		0.6	%		1.9	%		3.5	%		4.8	%

(In thousands, except ratios and per share data)	Eleven Years Ended October 2, 2004
	1998			1997			1996			1995			1994
Income Statement Data:
Net sales	$	1,331,545		$	1,277,649		$	1,139,310		$	931,806		$	922,609
Gross profit(d)		136,103			114,467			70,640			74,144			110,827
Operating income(d)		77,256			63,894			21,504			24,930			59,698
Interest expense, net		20,148			22,075			21,539			17,483			19,175
Income (loss) before income taxes(d)		56,522			43,824			(4,533	)		2,091			42,448
Income tax expense (benefit)(e)		6,512			2,788			2,751			10,058			11,390
Net income (loss)		50,010			41,036			(7,284	)		(7,967	)		31,058
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(f)		2.96x			2.57x			(f	)		1.07x			2.79x
Per Common Share Data:(g)
Net income (loss)	$	1.21		$	0.99		$	(0.18	)	$	(0.19	)	$	0.75
Cash dividends		0.04			0.04			0.04			0.04			0.04
Book value		5.58			4.41			3.46			3.67			3.91
Balance Sheet Summary:
Working capital	$	147,040		$	133,542		$	88,455		$	88,395		$	99,724
Total assets		601,439			579,124			536,722			497,604			438,683
Notes payable and current maturities of long-term debt		5,889			11,596			35,850			18,187			4,493
Long-term debt, less current maturities		199,784			224.743			198,334			182,988			152,631
Total stockholders’ equity		230,871			182,516			143,135			152,074			161,696
Cash Flow Summary:
Operating cash flow	$	85,016		$	49,615		$	11,391		$	32,712		$	60,664
Depreciation & amortization(h)		32,591			29,796			28,024			26,127			25,177
Capital expenditures		53,518			50,231			34,314			35,194			25,547
Business acquisitions, net of equity consideration(a)(c)		--			--			--			36,178			--
Financing activities, net provided by (used in)		(32,498	)		348			27,313			40,173			(30,291	)
Other Data:
EBITDA(i)		108,268			94,782			43,269			44,455			85,434
Key Indicators (as a percentage of net sales):
Gross profit		10.2	%		9.0	%		6.2	%		8.0	%		12.0	%
Selling, general and administrative expenses		4.4	%		4.0	%		4.3	%		5.3	%		5.5	%
Operating income (loss)		5.8	%		5.0	%		1.9	%		2.7	%		6.5	%
Interest expense, net		1.5	%		1.7	%		1.9	%		1.9	%		2.1	%
Net income (loss)		3.8	%		3.2	%		(0.6	)%		(0.9	)%		3.4	%

(a)	The Company acquired the ConAgra chicken division on November 23, 2003 for $635.2 million including the non-cash value of common stock issued of $357.5 million. The acquisition has been accounted for as a purchase and the results of operations for this acquisition have been included in our consolidated results of operations since the acquisition date.

(b)	On April 26, 2004, the Company announced a plan to restructure its turkey division, including the sale of some facilities in Virginia. The facilities were sold in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004. In connection with the restructuring, the Company recorded in cost of sales-restructuring charges of approximately $64.2 million and $7.9 million of other restructuring charges.

(c)	The Company acquired WLR Foods on January 27, 2001 for $239.5 million and the assumption of $45.5 million of indebtedness. The acquisition has been accounted for as a purchase and the results of operations for this acquisition have been included in our consolidated results of operations since the acquisition date.

(d)	Gross profit, operating income and other income include the following non-recurring recoveries, restructuring charges and other unusual items for each of the years presented (in millions):

	2004			2003		2002
Effect on Gross Profit and Operating Income:
Cost of sales-restructuring	$	(64.2	)	$	--	$	--
Non-recurring recoveries recall insurance	$	23.8		$	--	$	--
Non-recurring recoveries for avian influenza	$	--		$	26.6	$	--
Non-recurring recoveries for vitamin and methionine litigation	$	0.1		$	19.9	$	0.8

Additional effect on Operating Income:
Other restructuring charges	$	(7.9	)	$	--	$	--

Other income for vitamin and methionine litigation	$	0.9		$	36.0	$	4.3

In addition, the Company estimates its losses related to the October 2002 recall (excluding the insurance recovery described above) and 2002 avian influenza outbreak negatively affected gross profit and operating income in each of the years presented as follows (in millions):

	2004			2003			2002
Recall effects (estimated)	$	(20.0	)	$	(65.0	)	$	--
Losses from avian influenza (estimated)	$	--		$	(7.3	)	$	(25.6	)

(e)	Fiscal 2003 included a non-cash tax benefit of $16.9 million associated with the reversal of a valuation allowance on net operating losses in the Company’s Mexico operations. Fiscal 2002 included a tax benefit of $11.9 million from changes in Mexican tax laws. See Note G#@*#225;Income Taxes of the notes to consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein.

(f)	For purposes of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, earnings consist of income before income taxes plus fixed charges (excluding capitalized interest). Fixed charges consist of interest (including capitalized interest) on all indebtedness, amortization of capitalized financing costs and that portion of rental expense that we believe to be representative of interest. Earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges by $4.1 million and $5.8 million in fiscal 2002 and 1996, respectively.

(g)	Historical per share amounts represent both basic and diluted and have been restated to give effect to a stock dividend issued on July 30, 1999. The stock reclassification on November 21, 2004 that resulted in the new common stock traded as PPC did not affect the number of shares outstanding.

(h)	Includes amortization of capitalized financing costs of approximately $2.0 million, $1.5 million, $1.4 million, $1.9 million, $1.2 million, $1.1 million, $1.0 million, $0.9 million, $1.8 million, $1.2 million and $1.4 million in fiscal years 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1998, 1997, 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively.

(i)	"EBITDA" is defined as the sum of net income (loss) before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. EBITDA is presented because it is used by us and we believe it is frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties, in addition to and not in lieu of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) results, to compare the performance of companies. EBITDA is not a measurement of financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to cash flow from operating activities or as a measure of liquidity or an alternative to net income as indicators of our operating performance or any other measures of performance derived in accordance with GAAP.

A reconciliation of net income to EBITDA is as follows (in thousands):

	2004		2003		2002			2001		2000		1999		1998		1997		1996			1995			1994

Net Income (loss)	$	128,340	$	56,036	$	14,335		$	41,137	$	52,344	$	65,253	$	50,010	$	41,036	$	(7,284	)	$	(7,967	)	$	31,058
Add:
Interest expense, net		52,129		37,981		32,003			30,775		17,779		17,666		20,148		22,075		21,539			17,483			19,175
Income tax expense (benefit)		80,195		7,199		(12,425	)		20,724		10,442		25,651		6,512		2,788		2,751			10,058			11,390
Depreciation and amortization^(h)		113,788		74,187		70,973			55,390		36,027		34,536		32,591		29,796		28,024			26,127			25,177

Minus:
Amortization of capitalized financing costs^(h)		1,951		1,477		1,417			1,860		1,236		1,063		993		913		1,761			1,246			1,366
EBITDA	$	372,501	$	173,926	$	103,469		$	146,166	$	115,356	$	142,043	$	108,268	$	94,782	$	43,269		$	44,455		$	85,434

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

General

Profitability in the poultry industry is materially affected by the commodity prices of feed ingredients, chicken and turkey, which are determined by supply and demand factors. As a result, the chicken and turkey industries are subject to cyclical earnings fluctuations. Cyclical earnings fluctuations can be mitigated somewhat by:

- Business strategy;

- Product mix;

- Sales and marketing plans; and

- Operating efficiencies.

In an effort to reduce price volatility and to generate higher, more consistent profit margins, we have concentrated on the production and marketing of prepared foods products. Prepared foods products generally have higher profit margins than our other products. Also, the production and sale in the U.S. of prepared foods products reduces the impact of the costs of feed ingredients on our profitability. Feed ingredient purchases are the single largest component of our cost of goods sold, representing approximately 31% of our consolidated cost of goods sold in fiscal 2004. The production of feed ingredients is positively or negatively affected primarily by weather patterns throughout the world, the global level of supply inventories and demand for feed ingredients, and the agricultural policies of the U.S. and fo reign governments. As further processing is performed, feed ingredient costs become a decreasing percentage of a product’s total production cost, thereby reducing their impact on our profitability. Products sold in this form enable us to charge a premium, reduce the impact of feed ingredient costs on our profitability and improve and stabilize our profit margins.

As a significant portion of the U.S. poultry production is exported, the commodity prices of chicken and turkey can be, and in recent periods have been, adversely affected by disruptions in poultry export markets. These disruptions are often caused by restriction on imports of U.S.-produced poultry products

imposed by foreign governments for a variety of reasons, including the protection of their domestic poultry producers and allegations of consumer health issues.

For example, Russia and Japan have restricted the importation of U.S.-produced poultry for both of these reasons in recent periods. In July 2003, the U.S. and Mexico entered into a safeguard agreement with regard to imports into Mexico of chicken leg quarters from the U.S. Under this agreement, a tariff rate for chicken leg quarters of 98.8% of the sales price was established. This tariff rate was reduced on January 1, 2004 to 79.4% and will be reduced in each of the following four years in equal increments so that the final tariff rate at January 1, 2008 will be zero. The tariff was imposed due to concerns that the duty-free importation of such products as provided by the North American Free Trade Agreement would injure Mexico’s poultry industry. As such tariffs are reduced, we expect greater amount s of chicken to be imported into Mexico from the U.S., which could negatively affect the profitability of Mexican chicken producers and positively affect the profitability of U.S. exporters of chicken to Mexico. Although this could have a negative impact on our Mexican chicken operations, we believe that this will be mitigated by the close proximity of our U.S. operations to the Mexico border. We have the largest U.S. production and distribution capacities near the Mexican border, which gives us a strategic advantage to capitalize on exports of U.S. chicken to Mexico. Because these disruptions in poultry export markets are often political, no assurances can be given as to when the existing disruptions will be alleviated or that new ones will not arise.

Business Segments

We operate in two reportable business segments as (1) a producer of chicken and other products and (2) a producer of turkey products.

Our chicken and other products segment primarily includes sales of chicken products and by-products we produce and purchase for resale in the U.S., including Puerto Rico, and Mexico. This segment also includes the sale of table eggs, feed and certain other items. Our chicken and other products segment conducts separate operations in the U.S. and Puerto Rico and in Mexico and is reported as two separate geographical areas. Substantially all of the assets and operations of the recently acquired ConAgra chicken division are included in our U.S. chicken and other products segment since the date of acquisition.

Our turkey segment includes sales of turkey products produced in our turkey operations, which operate exclusively in the U.S.

Inter-area sales and inter-segment sales, which are not material, are accounted for at prices comparable to normal trade customer sales. Corporate expenses are allocated to Mexico based upon various apportionment methods for specific expenditures incurred related thereto with the remaining amounts allocated to the U.S. portions of the segments based on number of employees.

Non-recurring recoveries, which represent settlements for vitamin and methionine litigation covering several periods as well as federal compensation for avian influenza, have not been allocated to any segment because the proper allocation cannot be readily determined.

The following table presents certain information regarding our segments:

	*Fiscal Year Ended*
	October 2, 2004^(a)			September 27, 2003			September 28, 2002
	*(In thousands)*
Net Sales to Customers:
Chicken and Other Products:
United States	$	4,691,797		$	1,945,596		$	1,842,749
Mexico		385,674			368,071			342,851
Sub-total		5,077,471			2,313,667			2,185,600
Turkey		286,252			305,678			348,118
Total	$	5,363,723		$	2,619,345		$	2,533,718
Operating Income (Loss):
Chicken and Other Products:
United States	$	389,478		$	74,807		$	31,907
Mexico		(3,586	)		16,319			17,064
Sub-total		385,892			91,126			48,971
Turkey^(b)		(120,654	)		(73,992	)		(19,823	)
Sub-total		265,238			17,134			29,148
Non-recurring recoveries^(c)		76			46,479			756
Total	$	265,314		$	63,613		$	29,904
Depreciation and Amortization:^(d)
Chicken and Other Products:
United States	$	94,540		$	54,150		$	47,528
Mexico		12,361			12,116			13,526
Sub-total		106,901			66,266			61,054
Turkey		6,887			7,921			9,919
Total	$	113,788		$	74,187		$	70,973
Total Assets:
Chicken and Other Products:
United States	$	1,847,141		$	800,605		$	775,395
Mexico		276,685			263,530			241,919
Sub-total		2,123,826			1,064,135			1,017,314
Turkey		122,163			193,349			210,576
Total	$	2,245,989		$	1,257,484		$	1,227,890
Capital Expenditures:
Chicken and Other Products
United States	$	62,828		$	38,774		$	65,775
Mexico		8,663			9,218			7,934
Sub-total		71,491			47,992			73,709
Turkey		8,151			5,582			6,679
Total	$	79,642		$	53,574		$	80,388

(a)	The Company acquired the ConAgra chicken division on November 23, 2003 for $635.2 million. The acquisition has been accounted for as a purchase and the results of operations for this acquisition have been included in our consolidated results of operations since the acquisition date.

(b)	Included in fiscal 2004 are restructuring charges totaling $72.1 million offset somewhat by the non-recurring recovery of $23.8 million representing the gain recognized on the insurance proceeds received in connection with the October 2002 recall.

(c)	Non-recurring recoveries which have not been allocated to the individual segments are as follows (in millions):

	October 2, 2004		September 27, 2003			September 28, 2002
Avian influenza	$	--	$	26.6	$ -
Vitamin		0.1		1.6	0.8
Methionine		--		18.3	--

Total	$	0.1	$	46.5	$ 0.8

(d)	Includes amortization of capitalized financing costs of approximately $2.0 million, $1.5 million and $1.4 million in fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

The following table presents certain items as a percentage of net sales for the periods indicated:

Fiscal Year Ended

	October 2, 2004			September 27, 2003			September 28, 2002
Net sales		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%
Cost and Expenses
Cost of sales		89.7			94.1			93.5
Cost of sales-restructuring		1.2			--			--
Non-recurring recoveries		(0.4	)		(1.8	)		--
Gross profit		9.5			7.7			6.5
Selling, general and administrative expense		4.4			5.2			5.3
Other restructuring charges		0.1			--			--
Operating income		4.9			2.4			1.2
Interest expense, net		1.0			1.5			1.3

Income before income taxes		3.9			2.4			0.1
Net income		2.4			2.1			0.6

Results of Operations

The change in our results of operations for fiscal 2004 as compared to fiscal 2003 is impacted by a number of significant items. The following is a brief description of these items and the nature of their effect on each of the periods being presented.

First, as discussed below and in Note B-Business Acquisition of the notes to consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein, on November 23, 2003 we completed the purchase of the ConAgra chicken division. This acquisition has resulted in significant increases in net sales and related costs, as well as assets, liabilities, interest and outstanding debt. The acquired business has been included in our results of operations for 45 of the 53 weeks in fiscal 2004.

Second, the increase in U.S. chicken sales reflects an 18.9% increase in total revenue per dressed pound produced, primarily due to significantly higher chicken selling prices during the year. Chicken component market prices reached their highest level in the U.S. since 1999 during our fiscal 2004 third quarter. Since that time, the reference chicken component market prices have declined significantly. However, partially offsetting this decline in component market chicken prices are recent declines in market prices for corn and soybean meal, which are a significant component of our consolidated cost of sales. Additionally, barring widespread weather or other problems in grain producing areas, worldwide corn and soybean meal productivity is expected to increase, which should further favorably impact feed ingredie nt costs in fiscal 2005 and should partially offset the decline in U.S. component market chicken prices.

Third, fiscal 2004 included 53 weeks versus fiscal 2003, which included 52 weeks, resulting in an increase in each of the categories discussed in our results of operations by approximately 1.9% as compared to the corresponding period in the preceding year. As this change impacted all the income statement categories in a reasonably consistent manner, no separate discussion of this factor is included in our results of operations discussion, unless the impact of the applicable category varied from the increase described above.

Fourth, as discussed above under "Restructuring of Turkey Operations" and in Note C-Restructuring Charges and Non-Recurring Recoveries of the notes to consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein, on April 26, 2004 we announced a plan to restructure our turkey business and recorded, as cost of sales-restructuring, $64.2 million, primarily due to asset impairments and inventory losses on discontinued products, and, as other restructuring charges, $7.9 million, primarily related to exit and severance costs. We expect that commodity sales in our turkey division will decrease by approximately $70 million in fiscal 2005 as a result of this restructuring.

Finally, in October 2002, one product sample produced in our Franconia, Pennsylvania facility that had not been shipped to customers tested positive for Listeria. We later received information from the USDA suggesting environmental samples taken at the facility had tested positive for both the strain of Listeria identified in the product and a strain having characteristics similar to those of the strain identified in a Northeastern Listeria outbreak. As a result, we voluntarily recalled all cooked deli products produced at the plant from May 1, 2002 through October 11, 2002. We estimate that gross profit and operating income were negatively affected by this product recall by approximately $20 million in fiscal 2004 and $65.0 million in fiscal 2003 prior to the insurance recovery discussed below. We carry insuran ce designed to cover the direct recall related expenses and certain aspects of the related business interruption caused by a recall. As a result of this recall, the Company’s insurance claim for business interruption and certain product re-establishment costs amounted to approximately $74 million for the period from the date of the recall through October 11, 2003, the one year anniversary of the recall and the insurance policy time limitation period for business interruption loss recovery. Aggregating the direct recall expense claim with the anticipated business interruption and product re-establishment costs, our total loss was approximately $100 million, although our policy limit was $50 million. We received $4 million of this amount in fiscal 2003 and the remaining $46 million in fiscal 2004 from our insurer. In connection with the receipt of the insurance proceeds, we recognized $23.8 million as a component of non-recurring recoveries in our consolidated statement of income for fiscal 2004.

After considering the fiscal 2004 losses related to the 2002 recall and the restructuring of the turkey division in fiscal 2004, we believe we will significantly reduce our losses in the turkey division in fiscal 2005.

Fiscal 2004 Compared to Fiscal 2003

Net Sales. Net Sales for fiscal 2004 increased $2.7 billion, or 104.8%, over fiscal 2003. The following table provides additional information regarding net sales (in millions):

	Fiscal Year Ended
		October 2,		Change from			Percentage
Source		2004		Fiscal 2003			Change

Chicken and other products:
United States-
Chicken		$	4,091.7	$	2,353.4			135.4	%	(a	)
Other products			600.1		392.8			189.5	%	(b	)
		$	4,691.8	$	2,746.2			144.1	%

Mexico-
Chicken		$	362.4	$	13.1			3.8	%
Other products			23.2		4.5			24.1	%
		$	385.6	$	17.6			4.8	%

Turkey		$	286.3	$	(19.4	)		(6.3	)%	(c	)
		$	5,363.7	$	2,744.4			104.8	%

(a)	U.S. chicken sales increased primarily due to the acquisition of the ConAgra chicken division, which contributed $1,878.2 million since the acquisition. Also affecting the U.S. chicken sales was an increase of 15.9% in total revenue per dressed pound produced, primarily due to significantly higher component market chicken prices during the year. As described below under "Gross Profit" component market chicken prices have declined in recent months.

(b)	The ConAgra chicken division acquisition contributed $362.4 million to sales of other products primarily due to non-chicken products sold by the acquired distribution business.

(c)	The decrease in turkey sales was due to a decrease in turkey production created by a 15% reduction in turkey flocks beginning in July 2003, offset by an 8.9% increase in revenue per pound produced. As described above in "Restructuring of Turkey Operations" and in Note C - Restructuring Charges and Non-Recurring Recoveries of the notes to consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein, as a result of our fiscal 2004 restructuring of our turkey operations, we expect that commodity sales in our turkey division will decrease by approximately $70 million in fiscal 2005.

Gross Profit. Gross profit for fiscal 2004 increased $309.6 million, or 154.4%, over fiscal 2003. The following table provides gross profit information (in millions):


	Fiscal Year Ended									Percentage			Percentage
		October 2,			Change from		Percentage			of Net Sales			of Net Sales
Components		2004			Fiscal 2003		Change			Fiscal 2004			Fiscal 2003

Net sales		$	5,363.7		$	2,744.4		104.8	%		100.0	%		100.0	%
Cost of sales			4,813.3			2,348.0		95.2	%		89.7			94.1		(a	)
Cost of sales-restructuring			64.2			64.2		--			1.2			--		(b	)
Non-recurring recoveries			(23.9	)		22.6		(48.6	)%		0.4			(1.8	)	(c	)

Gross profit		$	510.1		$	309.6		154.4	%		9.5	%